Short answer: Fines are tiered: up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover for prohibited practices; up to €15 million or 3% for most other breaches including transparency and provider obligations; and up to €7.5 million or 1% for supplying incorrect or misleading information to authorities. For SMEs and startups, each cap applies as the lower of the fixed sum or the percentage — the reverse of how it works for large companies.
General information, not legal advice.
Tier one — prohibited practices. Up to €35 million or 7% of total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year. Reserved for the banned uses: social scoring, certain manipulative techniques, untargeted facial image scraping, emotion inference in workplaces and education, and specified biometric applications.
Tier two — most other obligations. Up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover. This covers provider and deployer obligations, transparency requirements under Article 50, and notified body duties. This is the tier most businesses would ever encounter.
Tier three — incorrect information. Up to €7.5 million or 1% for supplying incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to notified bodies or national authorities.
General-purpose AI model providers face a separate regime, with the Commission able to impose fines up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide turnover — powers that became exercisable from 2 August 2026.
For large companies, each tier applies as whichever figure is higher — so a large firm faces the greater of €15 million or 3%. For SMEs, including startups, the Act specifies that each cap applies as whichever is lower.
For a small business, 3% of turnover is a far smaller number than €15 million, so the percentage governs. The headline figures that dominate the coverage are structurally inapplicable to a business turning over a few hundred thousand pounds.
This is not a reason to ignore the rules. It is a reason to reject the framing that a small consultancy faces existential fines for a missing chatbot notice.
The Act requires that fines be effective, proportionate and dissuasive, with authorities taking into account a list of factors including:
The Act also expressly requires that the interests of SMEs and their economic viability be taken into account. Documented good-faith effort matters materially to where you land within a range.
For a small business, the realistic exposure isn't a regulator's penalty notice. It's three quieter things:
Proportionate compliance addresses all three, which is the actual business case.
National market surveillance authorities in each member state, with penalties set by national law within the Act's ceilings. The AI Office handles general-purpose AI models at EU level. There is no single pan-EU enforcement body for the rest, which means practice will vary between member states in the early years.
Enforcement powers for the earlier obligations became exercisable from August 2025 and 2026 respectively. Check current enforcement news rather than relying on any article's snapshot.
It's in the Act's penalty provisions. Whether your business meets the SME definition depends on the EU thresholds for headcount and turnover.
An AI use register, a two-page usage policy, recorded training, and transparency notices where they apply. Days of work, not months.
We help businesses find the obligations that genuinely apply — without the scare tactics. Start a free assessment.